Back when the VSCA was a business I thought I’d like to offer other writers the opportunity to make their own Soft Horizon games. New planes with their own themes that use the same rules, but interpreted through the lens of someone other than me. I really think the intrinsic diversity of Soft Horizon themes would be well served by a diversity of authors. Now, since I didn’t really take the business end seriously enough this never came to fruition (though it came close and there is at least one brilliant near-built plane out there).
Now that this isn’t a business I’d like to offer up the style guide. This was a kind of contract but of course that’s no longer necessary, so all the shalls should be read as shoulds. And I won’t publish or lay out or illustrate with you unless it seems like huge fun. If you do choose to make a Soft Horizon game and follow the spirit of the style guide here, we’ll have an anthology of wildly diverse but linked game, a psychedelia of shared space generators. And that would thrill me. I would love it if you at least POD produced it (which is damned near free to do — no risk at all) so I can have a shelf of books in this vein one day. And maybe I’d string them all together, with your permission, into a fat crazy book we can all wonder at.
Keep tone conversational and idiomatic: let your authorial voice out.
Provide illustration notes as comments in your submission in case we get around to finding an illustrator. Better yet, illustrate it yourself. Your artistic talent isn’t relevant.
You should recommend or produce at least five illustrations.
Use gender neutral pronouns or sentence structure unless the setting demands distinction.
Whenever considering sexuality, write in diversity.
Whenever considering gender, write in diversity.
Whenever considering “race”, write in diversity.
Whenever considering disability/ability, write in diversity.
Be political; don’t be shy. These planes can be metaphors. Should be.
If swearing moves your narrative along, swear like a motherfucker.
Write as much as you need to develop your idea: there is no word minimum nor maximum.
Providing a map may indicate that your text is too specific. Providing a way to create maps indicates that your text is supplying the table with tools to create rapidly and in context.
That is a general statement disguised as a specific one.
Write a custom introduction
Re-write SYSTEM section in your voice keeping the system materially identical but replacing examples with setting specific examples.
Do not change the METHODS list as characters need to be portable.
Do not change the RISKS list though absolutely change examples to mate with your setting.
Do not change how wounds and debt works unless the change is ADDITIVE (adds new options and does not change or delete old ones) and CONTEXTUAL (clearly adapts the material to the new setting).
Do not change how progression works unless the change is ADDITIVE and CONTEXTUAL
Do not change the ref’s role (especially the GM moves) unless the change is ADDITIVE and CONTEXTUAL.
Whatever you add to the system:
- The ref NEVER rolls in a resolution process
- There are NEVER flat modifiers (+1, +2, whatever) to the rolls
Be aware that failure and risk realization are an engine that makes this game easy to ref. If you reduce the failure rate too much the game will stall. And it has to survive progression as well.
Organize and explore your setting any way you like. It is not necessary to keep the organizational structure of the setting section in any other SH book.
Ensure that there are ways to develop places and people with a minimum of referee effort.
Lean on ORACLES, simple short text open to interpretation. Give the player something to create from rather than creating for them.
Sell your theme not you details. The players will bring the detail.
Ensure that the SETTING section ends with a note on the Soft Horizon and how your setting links to it.
Re-write to suit your setting.
Try to keep to the power scale established in THE KING MACHINE but you do not need to be strict about it.
The DENIAL mechanism needs to be retained.
Ensure that you have developed a way to start the game with the player characters together and working towards a shared goal or mission.
Re-use the association rules if you like; modify as needed.
Find a novel element of your setting to bake into character creation. For KING MACHINE it’s simply that racial differences are real: different apes are distinct and visibly different species and have mechanically distinct features. This is only interesting if that’s not the case everywhere. It’s especially nice if it’s ONLY the case there. In SAND DOGS the distinction will be a sort of life path system a la Traveller. Find another way to alter character creation such that you get the same basic end result (number and type of dice to distribute) but get there another way, delivering some new feature to character background or play or both.
RUNNING THE GAME
Re-write to suit your setting.
Keep the note on fronts and preparation but tune to you setting and voice.
Add any sections necessary to guide a ref in your setting (such as the “dealing with inconsistency” section in King Machine).
Modify the ref’s cheat sheet to meet your needs.
Entirely your space.